UXMagic vs Google Stitch: Which AI Design Tool Wins in 2025?

A head-to-head breakdown of Google Stitch’s experimental prototyping vs. UXMagic’s end-to-end design copilot.

UXMagic LogoVSUXMagic Logo
The AI design landscape is heating up, and two names stand out in 2025: UXMagic and Google Stitch. Both promise to transform how teams design and ship products—but their approaches couldn’t be more different. In this guide, we’ll explore UXMagic vs Google Stitch, diving into features, pricing, and workflows to help you decide which tool fits your needs. Whether you’ve searched for Google Stitch AI, a Google Stitch review, or are curious about UXMagic, this comparison will give you the full picture.
Output Comparison: Side-by-Side Design Quality
Prompt 1
Design a responsive SaaS dashboard with navigation, charts, and a settings panel.

UXMagic.ai

UXMagic.ai Prompt
tick The dashboard provides a quick, comprehensive overview with multiple data points like total revenue, active users, conversion rate, and support tickets.
tick It features a 'Recent Activity' section that offers real-time, granular updates on user actions and system alerts, adding a dynamic and functional layer.
tick The number of metrics and sections on a single screen might overwhelm users and make it hard to focus on a single key performance indicator (KPI).
tick The layout is somewhat rigid and dense, which could make it difficult to scale or customize for different user needs.

Google Stitch

Google Stitch Prompt
tick The design is minimalistic and clean, with a clear focus on a few key growth and revenue metrics, making it easy to digest the information quickly.
tick The use of simple bar and line charts is effective for visualizing trends over time, providing a clear narrative without clutter.
tick It lacks the immediate, detailed overview of various metrics (e.g., active users, support tickets) that a more comprehensive dashboard offers.
tick The information presented is highly aggregated (monthly, quarterly, yearly) and lacks a 'recent activity' section, so it doesn't provide real-time updates or granular details.
Prompt 2
Generate a mobile e-commerce checkout flow with 3 steps: cart, shipping, and payment.

UXMagic.ai

UXMagic.ai Prompt
tick The checkout process is broken into clear, numbered steps, guiding the user logically through the purchase journey.
tick It includes a 'Continue as Guest' option, which simplifies the process for new users and can reduce cart abandonment.
tick The cart review page has a lot of information, including multiple product images and a detailed order summary, which can feel visually heavy and overwhelming.
tick The 'Total' is displayed twice on the screen, which is redundant and clutters the interface.

Google Stitch

Google Stitch Prompt
tick The layout is very clean and minimal, focusing only on the essential cart items and a summary, making it easy to scan and understand.
tick The bottom navigation bar is persistent and clear, allowing users to easily switch between different parts of the app without losing their place.
tick The shipping and tax costs are visible only at this stage and not broken down in a more detailed checkout process, which could surprise the user.
tick It lacks clear indicators of the checkout steps, so the user doesn't know how many more screens are involved in the process.
UXMagic.ai

UXMagic is a full-stack design copilot launched in 2024. It helps professionals cut design-to-ship time by up to 70%, automating sitemaps, flows, high-fidelity mockups, and even production-ready code. With deep Figma integration, a rich component library, and analytics-driven optimization, UXMagic is built for agencies, freelancers, and teams who need more than just pretty screens—it’s designed for real, shippable products.

Google Stitch

Google Stitch is an experimental AI prototyping tool introduced at Google I/O 2025. Built on technology from Galileo AI (acquired by Google), it generates UIs from text prompts, sketches, or images. Backed by Google’s Gemini AI models, Stitch is fast, free, and positioned as a way to showcase Google’s AI capabilities. While great for overcoming the “blank canvas” problem, it remains limited in scope and reliability for complex UX workflows.

Feature Comparison
FeatureUXMagic.aiGoogle Stitch
Prompt-to-UI
tick Yes, with sitemap + flows
tick Yes, strong visual generation
Export Options
tick HTML, React, Webflow, WordPress, Shopify, PowerBI
tick HTML, CSS, React only
Style Guide
tick Imports design systems from Figma
tick Not available
Component Editing
tick 1,000+ pre-built elements
tick None
Team Features
tick Multi-project, agency-ready plans
tick None (solo use only)
Figma Plugin
tick Dedicated plugin + design system sync
tick One-click export only
Real-Time Preview
tick Yes, interactive
tick Limited
Post-Launch Tools
tick Data-driven optimization
tick Not available
Who should use what?
Who Should Use UXMagic
tick

Agencies needing end-to-end workflows

tick

Freelancers delivering polished client-ready projects

tick

Startups wanting to reduce design-to-ship time

tick

Teams requiring exports beyond just HTML (e.g., Webflow, Shopify)

Who Should Use Google Stitch
tick

Students or hobbyists exploring AI UI design

tick

Product managers testing early concepts

tick

Developers needing quick HTML/CSS prototypes

tick

Anyone curious about Google Stitch AI without budget constraints

Pricing Comparison
UXMagic Logo

Free$0/month

1 project, 60 free credits (one-time), upto 10 screens, 1 Figma export

Premium$14/month

5 projects, 300 credits (monthly), upto 50 screens, 50 Figma exports, React/HTML exports

Ultimate$28/month

buildwith-mocha.json

UXPilot Logo

Free$0

limited features since it's on beta (Stitch)

🎉 ROI Tip

Stitch wins on price (free), but UXMagic’s predictable pricing and ROI-focused features make it the sustainable choice for professionals

Final Verdict

When it comes to UXMagic vs Google Stitch, the choice depends on your goals:

If you need end-to-end workflows, production-ready exports, and professional reliability, UXMagic is the clear winner.

If you need quick, free prototypes, Stitch is great for ideation and testing visuals.

In short: Stitch is the spark. UXMagic is the ship.

Frequently Asked Questions
Yes. UXMagic covers the full workflow with exports, plugins, and optimizations, while Google Stitch is more for experimentation.
Your Workflow Deserves Magic

Stop wasting time on repetitive design work. UXMagic brings your ideas to life in seconds—so you can focus on thinking big, not clicking pixels.

UXMagic