UXMagic vs Onlook: Which AI Design Tool Wins in 2025?

Two powerful approaches. One critical decision. In this comparison, we’ll break down UXMagic vs Onlook—their features, pricing, pros, and who should use each. Whether you’re exploring onlook pricing, diving into onlook GitHub, or curious about how UXMagic stacks up against this open-source challenger, this page has you covered.

We're breaking down UXMagic vs Onlook across features, outputs, pricing, and target users—helping you decide which tool fits your needs.

Prompt 1:

Design a responsive SaaS dashboard with sidebar navigation, dark mode toggle, and activity feed.

UXMagic

The interface is professional and clean, using a traditional dashboard layout with clear divisions for different data sections.

It provides a clear and straightforward overview of key metrics like 'Active Customers', 'Sales', and 'Revenue', making it easy for users to find essential information.

The design is very text and data-heavy, lacking more engaging visual elements like charts or graphs to represent trends over time.

The overall aesthetic is somewhat dated and generic, which may not create a strong or memorable brand identity.

Onlook

The design is modern and visually striking, using a vibrant color palette and a bold, illustrative graphic to create a distinctive brand identity.

It effectively uses a combination of data points and visuals to quickly convey insights, with charts that show trends for 'Active Users' and 'Revenue' at a glance.

The non-traditional, asymmetrical layout, while unique, could be less intuitive for users accustomed to standard dashboard structures.

The bright and busy visual style might be distracting and could make it harder for some users to focus on the raw data.

Prompt 2:

Generate a modern e-commerce product page with image gallery, size selector, and ‘add to cart’ button.

UXMagic

The design is modern and visually appealing, using a bright, contrasting color palette to draw attention to key elements like the 'Add to Cart' button.

It provides a clear and organized breakdown of product features with checkmarks, which builds trust and helps customers quickly understand the benefits.

The asymmetrical layout and background elements, while unique, might be distracting for users trying to focus on the product details.

The product thumbnails are placed in a less conventional way, which could be confusing for users who expect them to be placed below the main image.

Onlook

The design is simple, clean, and uses a dark theme effectively to make the product image and text stand out.

The product information is logically organized, with clear sections for size, quantity, materials, and care instructions.

The overall layout is somewhat basic and might lack the visual dynamism or modern feel of more current e-commerce sites.

The product thumbnails below the main image are small, which makes it hard to see the details of the alternative views.

UXMagic

UXMagic is an AI-powered design copilot that accelerates UI/UX workflows. From wireframes to high-fidelity mockups, it generates Figma-ready designs and production-ready code. With support for inputs like text prompts, sketches, screenshots, and URLs, UXMagic makes design iteration lightning-fast. It’s a tool for designers, agencies, and startups looking to ship polished work quickly

Onlook

Onlook is an open-source, AI-first visual code editor built for the React ecosystem. Instead of static mockups, it works directly on live React components. Designers and developers collaborate seamlessly through a bi-directional loop: visual edits sync into code, and code edits reflect instantly in the visual editor. With its onlook GitHub presence and growing community.

Feature	UXMagic	Onlook
Prompt to UI	Turns text into full layouts instantly	Not prompt-based; edits live code directly
Style Guide	One-click apply & enforce consistency	Maintains dev-styled code, minimal style bloat
Component Editing	AI-assisted sectional edits + agentic assistant	Direct manipulation of live components
Team Features	Collaboration, multiple exports, credit-based usage	Real-time comments, version history, open-source ecosystem
Figma Plugin	Exports directly to Figma	Imports Figma → React components
Real-Time Preview	AI-generated interactive previews	Live React previews with state + data

UXMagic

Designers and agencies building multi-platform projects

Startups creating MVPs fast

Non-technical users who need prompt-to-UI speed

Teams already working in Figma-first environments

Onlook

Front-end developers in React/Next.js + Tailwind CSS

Technical founders who want clean, production-ready code

Hybrid designer-developers who prefer working in live codebases

Teams interested in open-source workflows via onlook GitHub

Free – $0

1 project + 120 credits (~20 screens)

Premium – $14/mo

5 projects + 480 credits (~80 screens) + advanced exports

Ultimate – $28/mo

unlimited projects + 1,500 credits (~250 screens) + URL-to-UI + system imports

Free – $0

5 projects, limited AI chat messages

Pro – $25/mo

unlimited projects, custom domains, team features

Enterprise –

Custom pricing, on-premise, premium support

🎉 ROI Tip

UXMagic ROI Advantage: Broader input/output options across ecosystems make it more cost-effective for cross-platform teams, while Onlook pricing is attractive for React-native workflows.

Final Verdict

The UXMagic vs Onlook debate boils down to philosophy

UXMagic: Best for design-first teams who need speed, versatility, and platform-agnostic exports.

Onlook: Best for developer-led teams committed to React/Next.js who want code-first control and open-source flexibility.

If you’re building across multiple platforms and need rapid AI-generated outputs, go with UXMagic. If you’re all-in on React and want to eliminate design handoff, Onlook shines