UXMagic vs Figma AI (Figma Make): The 2025 AI Design Tool Showdown

Two AI design products with two very different missions. Which one should power your next product?

UXMagic LogoVSUXMagic Logo
In the rapidly evolving AI design space, UXMagic vs Figma Make is a comparison many product teams are asking in 2025. While Figma Make integrates deeply into Figma for high-fidelity prototypes, UXMagic focuses on speed, flexibility, and production-ready code across platforms. This page breaks down the differences in inputs, outputs, pricing, and ideal use cases so you can make an informed choice.
Output Comparison: Side-by-Side Design Quality
Prompt 1:
Design a SaaS analytics dashboard for a social media performance tool. The dashboard should have a left navigation bar with icons + labels for Overview, Content, Engagement, Audience, and Reports. The main Overview page should show KPI cards (follower growth, engagement rate, impressions, CTR) with bold, large typography and clean data visualization using line charts, bar graphs, and donut charts. Use a cool, professional color palette (deep blue, white, and accents of electric cyan). Include a top bar with date range filter, user profile dropdown, and notifications. Layout should be fully responsive with an airy, grid-based structure.

UXMagic.ai

UXMagic.ai Prompt
tick Strong color palette match with deep blue, white, and electric cyan accents.
tick Bold typography for KPI cards, making metrics stand out.
tick Slightly denser layout in some sections; could be more airy.
tick Can be a little more compact to show more info in a single fold.

Figma Make

Figma Make Prompt
tick Airy layout with more whitespace, making it visually light.
tick Good use of typography hierarchy for section headings.
tick Color palette drifts from prompt (reds/pinks instead of electric cyan).
tick Less emphasis on KPI card boldness; metrics feel less impactful.
Prompt 2:
Design a modern mobile banking app for eco-conscious users. The UI should feel fresh, clean, and minimal, using soft green and beige tones inspired by nature. Include a dashboard home screen with account balances, spending categories (with iconography for food, travel, shopping, utilities), and a "carbon footprint" tracker. Add a transaction detail screen that shows a map view of purchase location, merchant info, and "eco score" for each transaction. Typography should be elegant and highly readable on small screens. All elements must follow a rounded card-based layout with soft shadows and micro-interactions in mind.

UXMagic.ai

UXMagic.ai Prompt
tick Rounded cards with soft shadows, matches prompt. Has better visual hierarchy.
tick Quick-action buttons ("Send," "Receive," "Pay") are included.
tick Bright colors might clash with soft green/beige palette.
tick Carbon tracker uses kg instead of tons, inconsistent with prompt wording.

Figma Make

Figma Make Prompt
tick Fully consistent with soft green/beige eco tones.
tick Includes all requested categories (food, travel, shopping, utilities).
tick Flat design, lacks card depth. Slightly less polish in visual hierarchy.
tick No quick banking actions present.
About UXMagic

UXMagic is your AI-powered design copilot, built for creators who need to ship fast. It helps you go from prompt to responsive UI, clone entire websites, or generate screens from images, sketches, or URLs. With support for Figma, React, HTML, Webflow, and more, it’s ideal for teams that design in one tool and build in another. Whether you're ideating or deploying, UXMagic accelerates your entire pipeline. Explore its features or pricing to learn more.

About Figma Make

Figma Make is Figma’s AI-driven prototyping tool, powered by Anthropic’s Claude Sonnet model. Integrated directly into Figma, it transforms text prompts, images, and Figma frames into functional prototypes. It’s designed to help teams quickly explore interactions, validate concepts, and collaborate in real time. However, its outputs are aimed at prototyping, not production, and access is tied to Figma’s most expensive “Full seat” subscription tiers.

Feature Comparison
FeatureUXMagic CopilotFigma Make
Prompt to UI
tick Generate multi-screen UI from natural language
tick Generate UI from text prompts
Image to UI
tick Convert screenshots/images to editable UI
tick Limited Image Reference
Sketch to UI
tick Turn hand-drawn sketches into UI
tick Not available
Clone Website to UI
tick Clone any website to editable design
tick Not available
Export
tick One-click export to Figma, Webflow, Wordpress, etc.
tick Hosted Prototype Only
Apply Style Guide/Branding
tick Apply consistent design system across screens
tick Paid plans only, inconsistent
Component Editing
tick Available (with prompts & Style Guide)
tick Point & prompt editing
Connect Existing Figma Designs
tick Import existing designs from Figma
tick Available natively (inside Figma)
Code Export (HTML/React)
tick Production-ready HTML/React code
tick Functional but not production-ready
Who should use what?
Who should use UXMagic?
tick

Design agencies creating multiple client projects across platforms

tick

Startups building MVPs quickly with usable front-end code

tick

Front-end developers wanting AI-generated scaffolding they can directly integrate

tick

Large design teams accelerating screen creation before refinement in Figma

Who should use Figma Make?
tick

Product teams already deeply invested in the Figma ecosystem

tick

Teams needing interactive prototypes for usability testing and stakeholder demos

tick

Non-technical stakeholders creating proof-of-concept apps without code

tick

Non-designers who need basic mockups to validate ideas

Pricing Comparison
UXMagic Logo

Free$0/month

1 project, 60 free credits (one-time), upto 10 screens, 1 Figma export

Basic$7/month

1 project, 120 free credits (monthly), upto 20 screens, 20 Figma exports, React/HTML exports

Premium$14/month

5 projects, 300 credits (monthly), upto 50 screens, 50 Figma exports, React/HTML exports

Ultimate$28/month

Unlimited projects, 1440 credits (monthly), upto 240 screens, 240 Figma exports, unlimited React/HTML exports

UXPilot Logo

Free$0/month

Trial only (Limited AI credits)

Pro$15/month

3000 credits/month

Organization$45/month

3500 credits/month

Enterprise$75/month

4250 credits/month

🎉 ROI Tip

UXMagic’s pricing is not tied to per-seat Figma licensing and offers export flexibility across multiple platforms. Figma Make’s cost is baked into high-tier Figma seats, making it pricier for non-Figma-centric teams.

Final Verdict

In UXMagic vs Figma Make, the better choice depends on your bottleneck.

If you want production-ready code, multi-platform exports, and faster design-to-development handoff, UXMagic is the stronger, more versatile option.

If you need interactive, collaborative prototypes to validate experiences and you’re already paying for Figma Full seats, Figma Make is compelling.

For most teams aiming to ship real products, UXMagic offers a better ROI and broader applicability in 2025.

Frequently Asked Questions
UXMagic focuses on speed, flexibility, and production-ready exports, while Figma Make specializes in high-fidelity interactive prototypes inside Figma.
Your Workflow Deserves Magic

Stop wasting time on repetitive design work. UXMagic brings your ideas to life in seconds—so you can focus on thinking big, not clicking pixels.

UXMagic