UXMagic vs Galileo AI (Stitch): Which AI Design Tool Wins in 2025?

Google’s acquisition of Galileo AI (now relaunched as Stitch) reshaped the AI design landscape in 2025. Meanwhile, UXMagic has doubled down on being a professional-grade AI design copilot, integrating deeply into production workflows.

UXMagic LogoVSUXMagic Logo
We're breaking down UXMagic vs Galileo AI across features, outputs, pricing, and target users—helping you decide which tool fits your needs.
Output Comparison: Side-by-Side Design Quality
Prompt 1
Design a responsive SaaS dashboard with sidebar navigation, charts, and a dark/light toggle.

UXMagic

UXMagic Prompt
tick Excellent variety of data visualizations provides a comprehensive business overview at a glance.
tick Strong information hierarchy prioritizes key metrics at the top for quick assessment.
tick Inconsistent and low-contrast color usage, especially in the table, harms readability and accessibility.
tick The high density of information and mix of different UI styles create a visually cluttered interface.

Galileo AI

Galileo AI Prompt
tick The focused, minimalist design provides exceptional clarity and high readability for key metrics.
tick A restrained color palette and consistent component styling create a very cohesive aesthetic.
tick Charts lack necessary labels, tooltips, and context, making the data difficult to interpret accurately.
tick The layout feels unbalanced, with awkwardly scaled charts that make inefficient use of card space.
Prompt 2
Generate a mobile e-commerce checkout flow with address form, payment options, and confirmation screen.

UXMagic

UXMagic Prompt
tick A transparent order summary clearly breaks down all items, attributes, and costs.
tick Prominent express payment options reduce friction by letting users bypass manual entry.
tick The single, long-form design creates a high cognitive load that can overwhelm users.
tick Inefficient form layout with stacked fields makes the page feel unnecessarily long.

Galileo AI

Galileo AI Prompt
tick The low-friction design with pre-filled info provides an excellent, fast checkout for returning users.
tick Saved information is displayed in clean, scannable cards with clear, mobile-friendly controls.
tick The order summary lacks critical details like individual item prices and a full cost breakdown.
tick The CTA button misses the opportunity to include the final price for last-moment user reassurance.
UXMagic

UXMagic is your AI-powered design copilot, built for creators who need to ship fast. It helps you go from prompt to responsive UI, clone entire websites, or generate screens from images, sketches, or URLs. With support for Figma, React, HTML, Webflow, and more, it's ideal for teams that design in one tool and build in another. Whether you're ideating or deploying, UXMagic accelerates your entire pipeline. Explore its features or pricing to learn more.

Galileo AI

Originally founded in 2022 as Galileo AI, the tool was acquired by Google in May 2025 and rebranded as Stitch. It’s now a free, Google Labs product designed to showcase the power of Gemini models. Stitch excels at fast, high-fidelity mockups for brainstorming, prototyping, and pitches, but it lacks the deep workflow features that professional teams require.

Feature Comparison
FeatureUXMagicGalileo AI (Stitch)
Prompt to UI
tick Supports text, image, sketch, and URL cloning
tick Supports text, image, and sketch
Export Options
tick Figma, React, HTML, with Webflow/Framer roadmap
tick Figma, generic HTML/CSS/JSX
Style Guide
tick Apply brand style guide instantly across screens
tick Only basic theme (color, font, radius)
Component Editing
tick Sectional editing + component libraries
tick Limited refinement via chat
Figma Plugin
tick Two-way sync with projects + component libraries
tick One-way “paste to Figma”
Real-Time Preview
tick Yes, with production-ready code preview
tick Limited visual previews only
Unique Edge
tick Workflow moat: cloning, exports, system integration
tick Zero-cost, polished ideation
Who should use what?
UXMagic
tick

Design agencies handling multi-client workflows

tick

Professional UI/UX designers working in Figma + dev handoff

tick

Front-end teams needing clean, component-ready React/HTML

tick

Founders scaling products beyond MVP prototypes

Galileo AI (Stitch)
tick

Students or indie makers with no design budget

tick

Startup founders needing quick MVP visuals for pitch decks

tick

PMs & devs ideating features in minutes

tick

Teams exploring design ideas without worrying about production constraints

Pricing Comparison
UXMagic Logo

Free$0/month

1 project, 60 free credits (one-time), upto 10 screens, 1 Figma export

Premium$14/month

5 projects, 300 credits (monthly), upto 50 screens, 50 Figma exports, React/HTML exports

Ultimate$28/month

Unlimited projects, 1440 credits (monthly), upto 240 screens, 240 Figma exports, unlimited React/HTML exports

UXPilot Logo

Free$0

limited features since it's on beta (Stitch)

🎉 ROI Tip

UXMagic’s ROI is straightforward: saving 20–40 hours/month for $14–28 is an easy win compared to spending designer/developer hours manually.

Final Verdict

In the battle of UXMagic vs Galileo AI (Stitch), the winner depends on your stage:

If you need production-ready workflows, code exports, and style consistency for real products → UXMagic is the smarter investment.

If you need free, fast ideation and polished mockups for early pitches → Stitch by Google is unbeatable.

In short: Stitch shines in the first mile, UXMagic dominates the last mile.

Frequently Asked Questions
Galileo AI (Stitch) is free and great for ideation, while UXMagic focuses on production workflows with exports, Figma sync, and system integration.
Your Workflow Deserves Magic

Stop wasting time on repetitive design work. UXMagic brings your ideas to life in seconds—so you can focus on thinking big, not clicking pixels.

UXMagic