UXPilot: Which AI Design Tool Wins in 2025?

A practical, no-fluff breakdown of UXMagic vs UXPilot—covering features, pricing, export capabilities, and who each tool is really for.

UXMagic LogoVSUXMagic Logo
If you're choosing between UXMagic and UXPilot, you're already ahead of the curve. Both are cutting-edge AI tools built to supercharge product design. But while they may look similar on the surface, they serve very different needs. This guide breaks down UXMagic vs UXPilot so you can pick the platform that best fits your workflow, your team, and how fast you want to ship.
Output Comparison: Side-by-Side Design Quality
Prompt 1:
Design a one-fold dashboard for a crypto portfolio tracker. Show total value, individual token charts, daily change %, and recent transactions. Use dark theme, neon accents, and clean grid layout.

UXMagic.ai

UXMagic.ai Prompt
tick Follows a clean grid layout with clear separation of data blocks.
tick The design effectively uses neon accents to spotlight key metrics like growth and token performance.
tick Missing action buttons reduces its utility as a functional dashboard.
tick Doesn't fully showcase all token mini-charts equally, only BTC, ETH, SOL, ADA are visualized.

UX Pilot

UX Pilot Prompt
tick Covers all prompt elements: value, daily change, token charts, recent transactions, and quick actions.
tick Clean, functional layout with strong interactivity.
tick Visual hierarchy is weaker, key metrics don't stand out enough.
tick Neon accents feel underused; the visual doesn't fully embrace the neon aesthetic.
Prompt 2:
Create a beauty brand dashboard with bottom navigation, sales analytics, revenue charts, product performance metrics, customer insights, inventory status, and key business KPIs. Clean, modern design with data visualizations for tracking beauty product sales, trends, and business growth. Target: beauty brand managers and executives. Use brand color: #8152E1

UXMagic.ai

UXMagic.ai Prompt
tick Effectively integrates the brand color #8152E1, ensuring a cohesive visual experience.
tick Includes all requested metrics: KPIs, revenue trends, product performance, and customer insights.
tick Inventory status is missing, no mention of stock or supply data.
tick Slightly less polish in visual hierarchy compared to UX Pilot, everything feels equally weighted.

UX Pilot

UX Pilot Prompt
tick Strong visual hierarchy with clear grouping of KPIs, charts, and product insights.
tick Includes inventory data (low stock items), matching the prompt fully.
tick The brand color #8152E1 is minimally applied, missing an opportunity for a strong brand presence.
tick Minor spacing and padding inconsistencies are present.
About UXMagic

UXMagic is your AI-powered design copilot, built for creators who need to ship fast. It helps you go from prompt to responsive UI, clone entire websites, or generate screens from images, sketches, or URLs. With support for Figma, React, HTML, Webflow, and more, it's ideal for teams that design in one tool and build in another. Whether you're ideating or deploying, UXMagic accelerates your entire pipeline. Explore its features or pricing to learn more.

About UX Pilot

UXPilot is positioned as an AI-powered assistant for the entire UX process—from research and wireframes to heatmaps and design reviews. It's deeply embedded within the Figma ecosystem, offering a plugin-based experience where designers can generate screens, create user flows, and analyze usability—all inside Figma. Its core strength is holistic support for researchers, PMs, and UX generalists, not just visual designers.

Feature Comparison
FeatureUXMagic CopilotUXPilot
Prompt to UI
tick Generate multi-screen UI from natural language
tick Generate UI from text prompts
Image to UI
tick Convert screenshots/images to editable UI
tick Convert images to UI (limited styling controls)
Sketch to UI
tick Turn hand–drawn sketches into UI
tick Not available
Clone Website to UI
tick Clone any website to editable design
tick Not available
Apply Style Guide/Branding
tick Apply consistent design system across screens
tick Basic theming only
Connect Existing Figma Designs
tick Import existing designs from Figma
tick Figma plugin support
Export to Figma
tick One-click export to Figma
tick Export via plugin
Reference Frame for new designs
tick Auto–style new screens based on a reference frame
tick Style consistency from previous frames
Code Export (HTML/React)
tick Production-ready HTML/React code
tick HTML code only
Who should use what?
Who should use UXMagic?
tick

Professional designers who need production–ready outputs

tick

Product teams working on real applications

tick

Agencies delivering client work

tick

Startups that need to ship quickly with quality

Who should use UXPilot?
tick

Beginners just starting with design

tick

Students learning design principles

tick

Solo entrepreneurs with limited budgets

tick

Non–designers who need basic mockups

Pricing Comparision
UXMagic Logo

Free$0/month

1 project, 120 free credits (one-time), upto 20 screens, 1 Figma export

Premium$14/month

5 projects, 480 credits (monthly), upto 80 screens, 80 Figma exports, React/HTML exports

Ultimate$28/month

Unlimited projects, 1500 credits (monthly), upto 250 screens, 250 Figma exports, unlimited React/HTML exports

UXPilot Logo

Free$0/month

90 credits, Hifi UI, Wireframe, Design Review, Predictive Heatmap

Standard$12/month

420 credits, Hifi UI, Wireframe, Design Review, Predictive Heatmap, Export to Figma, Export code, Screen Flows (max. 5 screens)

Pro$22/month

1200 credits, Hifi UI, Wireframe, Design Review, Predictive Heatmap, Export to Figma, Export code, Screen flows, Section Edit, Image-to-Design

🎉 ROI Tip

If your team builds production-ready UIs, UXMagic offers better value—HTML/React export, Figma sync, and project scalability make it a more complete tool for design-to-dev workflows.

Final Verdict

UXMagic and UXPilot are both excellent tools for different stages of the design process. UXMagic is ideal for teams that need to ship fast and have a robust design system, while UXPilot is perfect for beginners and those who prefer a more hands-on approach. The choice ultimately depends on your specific needs and workflow.

UXPilot is an excellent choice for beginners and those who prefer a more guided, plugin-based experience. It offers a simpler, more streamlined workflow for quick mockups and ideation.

UXMagic is the clear winner for professional designers and teams that require production-ready outputs. Its robust feature set, Figma integration, and advanced styling capabilities make it a powerful tool for the entire design-to-dev pipeline.

Ultimately, the decision between UXMagic and UXPilot comes down to your specific goals and workflow. If you need a fast, production-ready tool with a robust design system, UXMagic is the way to go. If you are just starting out or prefer a more hands-on approach, UXPilot is a fantastic option.

Frequently Asked Questions
UXMagic is built for professional designers and teams, offering production-ready code, design system integration, and superior output quality for real-world projects. UXPilot is ideal for beginners or for creating quick, basic mockups, but lacks the advanced capabilities needed for professional design workflows.
Your Workflow Deserves Magic

Stop wasting time on repetitive design work. UXMagic brings your ideas to life in seconds—so you can focus on thinking big, not clicking pixels.

UXMagic